Thirty Schools signed on to March for Schools Oakland Students Deserve on March 31!

Thirty schools and counting are planning to March for Schools Oakland Students Deserve on March 31st! Meet at San Antonio Park at 3pm for a family friendly rally before the 4:30 march to the OUSD Offices at 1000 Broadway (then take the 14 or the 40 AC Transit buses back to the park with other families and teachers).

RSVP at https://www.facebook.com/events/859143810811886/permalink/864919633567637/

Antwan Wilson: Why are you ignoring parents of the kids whose futures you are charged with shaping?

Mr Wilson, these parents are important to the future of OUSD, you should be reaching out to them and NOT ignoring them!! Thank you Cleveland Elementary parents for supporting our kids and our teachers!

'3/17/2015 Cleveland parents, wearing OEA green, greeted Superintendent Wilson. He neither greeted them or acknowledged their presence. "Although Mr. Wilson would not acknowledge us,we did get waves and even a "thumbs up" from his entourage. The fact he did not look, let us know that he was aware of our presence. We were a strong army of 5 when he passed by twice."'

3/17/2015 Cleveland parents, wearing OEA green, greeted Superintendent Wilson. He neither greeted them or acknowledged their presence. “Although Mr. Wilson would not acknowledge us,we did get waves and even a “thumbs up” from his entourage. The fact he did not look, let us know that he was aware of our presence. We were a strong army of 5 when he passed by twice.”

Charter Schools decline to participate in Mr Wilson’s Intensive Support Schools Initiative to turnaround 4 of 5 targeted schools

Charters Will Not Take Over Struggling Oakland Public Schools

By Sam Levin of the East Bay Express

After months of debate surrounding the Oakland Unified School District’s controversial effort to redesign several of its low-performing schools, officials announced this afternoon that no charter schools will be taking over the district sites. As part of its so-called “Intensive Support Schools Initiative,” which teachers first learned about in December, the district requested proposals to turn around five struggling schools. Through this process, existing leaders at the five schools could submit proposals — as could outside charter school organizations. Teachers and education activists immediately criticized the plan as a thinly veiled effort to encourage outside charter school operators to take over district-run public schools.

But today, OUSD announced that no charter schools plan to submit applications, which means the schools in question will remain district-run sites.

For four of the five schools in the turnaround initiative — Castlemont High School, Fremont High School, McClymonds High School, and Frick Middle School — applicants were required to submit letters of intent yesterday. The district has not yet announced a timeline for the fifth school, Brookfield Elementary School, which means its future remains uncertain. But for the other four schools, the district just published the letters of intent it received — see “proposal writing teams” at the district’s Intensive Support Schools website — and only district-run proposals are included. Troy Flint, OUSD spokesperson, confirmed to me that no charters submitted applications for those schools. The three high schools attracted only one applicant each — teams made up of existing teachers and school leaders at those sites. Three different teams, however, have indicated that they plan to submit proposals at Frick Middle School. The district says that in cases in which multiple letters of intent have been submitted for a single campus, the district “will be bringing the respective proposal writing teams together to encourage potential collaboration on a single proposal, wherever appropriate.” The letters of intent are short documents that outline proposal team members and broad goals for the proposals. The final applications are due May 21.

You can review the Castlemont High letter here, the Fremont High letter here, the McClymonds High letter here, and the Frick letters here,here, and here.  Flint said that the district will have an announcement about the status of Brookfield at a later date.

On Monday, the district also plans to announce the members of site-based committees for each school, which will be responsible for reviewing the proposals and making recommendations to the district’s academic review board and superintendent. Students, parents, and other community members were allowed to apply for positions on those committees.

FAQs and more on Article 12

Some answers to your questions about Article 12

ClassroomStruggle's avatarCLASSROOM STRUGGLE

Here is part of the packet distributed at OEA’s Article 12 Forum on 1/13/2015, including (1) FAQs on Article 12, (2) a summary of what the District wants to change in Article 12, and (3)  a description of advisory matching.

One more point about the district’s claim vs. its intention: The district’s explicit claim is that Article 12 leads to “bad fits” between teachers and schools, but the implicit message is that Art. 12 prevents the district from getting rid of “bad teachers.”  Article 12 has nothing to do with dismissing teachers;  it’s about transfer and consolidation procedures and rights. The district already has the power to dismiss teachers for unsatisfactory performance or unprofessional conduct.  But getting rid of Article 12 protections would provide far greater latitude to humiliate and force out teachers who voice criticisms, or advocate for students, colleagues, or students, pissed them off, or are “too expensive.” Eliminating Article 12 protections would…

View original post 1,726 more words

Comparison of OUSD teachers’ compensation with other Districts in Alameda County and Beyond

It is clear that OUSD teachers are at or near the bottom of the list when you compare their salary + benefits package at every stage of the game, and particularly at senior levels against other schools in Alameda County OR similar schools across the state.  GO provides a fairly balanced analysis based on actual contract data (see link below). It is interesting to note that although the benefits’ package is generally better than the other schools in Alameda County, it is below average when compared to similar districts across the state. One thing not clear from the analysis is that the comparison is static, meaning it is comparing our data from the current year to data from other districts for the current year only, and so while OUSD salaries need to increase 7.6% to reach the average for this year, the District is offering just 3.5% for 2014-15, further widening the gap:

http://www.goleadershipcenter.org/2015/03/compensation_comparison.php